Cases 31 - 40 of 187
Chandler v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-1733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Chandler
Defendant / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
IN RE: IBM ARBITRATION AGREEMENT LITIGATION
as 22-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Chastka, Mark Guerinot, William Abt and others
Defendant / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
SEELEY v. MCCORMACK
as 2:2022cv03020
Lead Plaintiff:
ERIC SEELEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM THOMAS MCCORMACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Williams Company Management Group, Inc. v. Comazzi
as 6:2022cv01258
Plaintiff:
Williams Company Management Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul Comazzi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
NAU Country Insurance Company v. Williams
as 5:2022cv00269
Petitioner:
NAU COUNTRY INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
Sheila Davis Williams
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Polska Fundacja Narodowa v. Athlete Benefits Group, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05725
Petitioner:
Polska Fundacja Narodowa
Respondent:
Athlete Benefits Group, LLC and Lamar D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 207 Application for order confirming award of arbitrators
MCCORMACK v. SEELEY
as 1:2022cv03349
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCORMACK
Defendant:
ERIC SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
MCCORMACK v. SEELEY
as 2:2022cv03349
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCORMACK
Defendant:
ERIC SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Gustin et al v. Kleen Concepts LLC
as 2:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Michael H Gustin, Cindy B Gustin, John William Rhea and others
Respondent:
Kleen Concepts LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
OptumRX Inc. v. Williams Pharmacy Holdings 1 LLC
as 8:2022cv00587
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
Williams Pharmacy Holdings 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
