Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kenco Group, Inc., et al v. James Kennedy, III
as 22-5778
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENCO GROUP, INC. and JANE KENNEDY GREENE
Petitioner:
SHELIA CRANE
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES KENNEDY, III
Kenco Group, Inc. et al v. Kennedy,III
as 1:2020cv00129
Respondent:
James Kennedy,III
Petitioner:
Jane Kennedy Greene, Kenco Group, Inc. and Shelia Crane
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Abarca et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07502
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Petitioner:
Muhammad Abdullah, Dominique Abbott, Marciano Abadilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Stone et al v. Wilshire-Pennington Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06098
Plaintiff:
Melody L. Stone, M.D. , Melody L. Stone M.D., P.C. Profit Sharing Plan DTD 01/20/09 and Melody L. Stone, M.D., P.C. Defined Benefit Pension Plan DTD 01/01/12
Defendant:
Wilshire-Pennington Group, Inc., Benjamin Daniel Kennedy, III and Benjamin Daniel Kennedy, IV
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Texakoma Financial, Inc., et al v Ridenour
as 4:2017cv00799
Petitioner:
Texakoma Financial, Inc. , Dean Richard Kennedy , Jeffery David Marlow and others
Respondent:
Ken W Ridenour
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. v. Duckworth et al
as 1:2016cv00410
Plaintiff:
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Roger F. Duckworth, Nicholas Kinghorn, John Rudland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. JAMES G. KENNEDY & CO., INC.
as 2:2013cv01047
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
JAMES G. KENNEDY & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
WESTGATE RESORTS, LTD. v. KENNEDY FUNDING, INC.
as 2:2012cv04979
Petitioner:
WESTGATE RESORTS, LTD.
Respondent:
KENNEDY FUNDING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
