Cases 11 - 20 of 158
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv03611
Plaintiff:
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
American Hospital Association et al v. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 4:2020cv08806
Defendant:
Secretary Alex M. Azar, II and Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff:
St. Mary's Medical Center, American Hospital Association, Riverside Regional Medical Center and others
Petitioner:
Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and AstraZeneca LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2020cv10488
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Seema Verma, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY ALLIANCE, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv03604
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SEEMA VERMA, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY ALLIANCE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Adventist Health System/SunBelt, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
United Network for Organ Sharing, Thomas J. Engels, The University of Alabama Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
University of Iowa, Medical University Hospital Authority, University of Kansas Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Association of Community Cancer Centers et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2020cv03531
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Brad Smith and others
Plaintiff:
National Infusion Center Association, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Association of Community Cancer Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Biotechnology Innovation Organization et al v. Alex M. Azar, II et al
as 3:2020cv08603
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Health and Human Services, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff:
Biocom California, California Life Sciences Association and Biotechnology Innovation Organization
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Clinical Oncology, National Association of Manufacturers and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Petitioner:
Alliance for Aging Research
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Association of Community Cancer Centers et al v. Azar et al
as 8:2020cv03531
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Brad Smith and others
Plaintiff:
National Infusion Center Association, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Association of Community Cancer Centers and others
Petitioner:
Healix Infusion Therapy, LLC and Summit On-Site Solutions, LLC d/b/a Altus Biologics
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Asapansa-Johnson Walker v. Azar II
as 20-3827
Defendant / Appellant:
Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tanya Asapansa-Johnson Walker and Cecilia Gentili
Coney Island Prep et al v. United States Department of Health And Human Services et al
as 1:2020cv09144
Plaintiff:
Coney Island Prep, Leslie-Bernard Joseph, Alexandra Greenberg and others
Defendant:
Dr. Robert R Redfield, Dr. Robert Kadlec, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
