Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Asante, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Asante, Asante Three Rivers Medical Center, Asante Rouge Valley Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Buffalo River Watershed Alliance v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2023cv03012
Plaintiff:
Buffalo River Watershed Alliance
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Timothy E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Western Energy Alliance et al v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Respondent:
Bureau of Land Management Director
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Western Energy Alliance et al v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 1:2022cv00252
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service and others
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Consolidated Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Abell et al v. U S Corps of Engineers
as 6:2022cv01353
Plaintiff:
I P O P L L C, Rivers of Gold Global TV Show Global Merchandising L P, Edward C Abell and others
Defendant:
U S Corps of Engineers, Christine Wormuth and Scott Spellmon
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Environmental Health et al v. Nishida et al
as 7:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Center for Environmental Health, Cape Fear River Watch, Clean Cape Fear and others
Defendant:
Jane Nishida, Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 22-1466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, AMERICAN RIVERS, PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lt. General.Commanding General and Chief of Engineers, RICHARD M. TOY and others
Diaz et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv02051
Plaintiff:
Lydia Gonzalez Diaz, Vanessa Walsh, Nina Crawford and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, New York City Housing Authority, Harlem River Preservation LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437 U.S. Housing Act of 1937
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
