Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 70
45COMMITTEE, INC. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al
as 1:2022cv01749
Plaintiff: 45COMMITTEE, INC.
Defendant: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and LISA J. STEVENSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Forsythe et al v. Vilsack et al
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff: Robin Forsythe and Lisa Forsythe
Defendant: Thomas J. Vilsack, United States Department of Agriculture, Marcia Bunger and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01422
Plaintiff: HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA
Defendant: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Lisa Stevenson and LISA J. STEVENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae: Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Trocano et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff: Alaina Trocano, Kathryn Gill, Tammy Gipp and others
Defendant: Centers for Disease Control & Prevention and Department of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Butt et al v. Jaddou et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff: Muhammad Usman Butt and Sophia Butt
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, AAD Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mahoney et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff: Pamela Mahoney, Michael Mahoney, Lisa Solomon and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, U.S. Department of the Army and others
Intervenor Defendant: South Fork Wind, LLC
Amicus Curiae: New York State Public Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating For Campus Equality, et al
as 21-1853
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating for Campus Equality
as 21-1784
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Doe, et al
as 21-1783
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: STATE OF TEXAS, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?