Cases 41 - 50 of 122
PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01491
Plaintiff:
PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION
Defendant:
STEVEN T. MNUCHIN
Amicus Curiae:
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS, SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE, YUROK TRIBE OF THE YUROK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
National Wildlife Federation ,et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 3:2020cv00443
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Todd T Semonite and Richard M. Toy
Plaintiff:
Great Rivers Habitat Alliance, Missouri Coalition for the Environment, National Wildlife Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Conservation Law Foundation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2020cv10820
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Merrimack River Watershed Council, Massachusetts Audubon Society, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, R.D. James and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League et al v. Wheeler et al
as 2:2020cv01687
Defendant:
Andrew R Wheeler, Rickey Dale James, United States Army Corps of Engineers, The and others
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife, South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, North Carolina Coastal Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01059
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Plaintiff:
ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE, CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01002
Plaintiff:
TULALIP TRIBES, HOULTON BAND OF MALISEET INDIANS, AKIAK NATIVE COMMUNITY and others
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Intervenor Defendant:
NAPASKIAK, INCORPORATED, ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGE CORPORATION ASSOCIATION, INC., CALISTA CORPORATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIVE AMERICAN FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, AFFILIATED TRIBES OF NORTHWEST INDIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00431
Intervenor:
Provident Irrigation District, State Water Contractors, Maxwell Irrigation District and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff:
Golden State Salmon Association, Bay.Org, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Petitioner:
People of the State of California, California Natural Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant:
Oakdale Irrigation District, Knights Landing Investors, LLC, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Natural Resources Agency, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00426
Plaintiff:
State of California by and through California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, California Environmental Protection Agency and California Natural Resources Agency
Intervenor:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, State Water Contractors, Westlands Water District and others
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sacramento River Intervenors, Oji Brothers Farm, Inc., Sutter Mutual Water Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ASANTE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv00601
Plaintiff:
ASANTE, YUMA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ASANTE THREE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SEEMA VERMA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv00599
Not Classified By Court:
ASANTE ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, THREE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
