Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Americans for Beneficiary Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Americans for Beneficiary Choice and Senior Security Benefits, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Roesel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Philip Roesel
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Roesel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Phillip Roesel
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al v. Secretary United States Department of Health and H, et al
as 24-1819
Plaintiff:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA AB
Defendant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, et al v. Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medic, et al
as 24-10875
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION and STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Servi
as 23-1231
Plaintiff:
Evergreen Homecare Service of NY Inc. and DHCare Homehealth, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc., Elim Home Care Agency, LLC, Silver Lining Homecare Agency and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, (HHS), Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Defendant:
Brett I. Friedman, in his official capacity as Medicaid Director of the New York State Department of Health
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration et al v. Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services et al
as 0:2023cv61595
Plaintiff:
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and State of Florida
Defendant:
Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
NEW JERSEY PODIATRIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS GROUP, LLC v. US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2023cv03428
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY PODIATRIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) and NOVITAS SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
as 23-1457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES and CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, in her official capacity as Administrator of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
State of Texas v. Becerra et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
