Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Ohio, State of
Amicus Curiae:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al., v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al.
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plano Chamber of Commerce, American Hotel and Lodging Association, Associated Builders and Contractors and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walmart, Inc. v. Jean King, et al
as 24-11733
Plaintiff:
WALMART, INC.
Defendant:
JEAN KING, In her official capacity as Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER, In her official capacity as Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his Official Capacity as U.S. Attorney General and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1480
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity
Interested Party:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. Conservation Law Foundation, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Appellant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Interested Party:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB
as 24-40331
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Hotel & Lodging Association, Associated Builders and Contractors and others
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, Lauren McFerran, Marvin Kaplan and others
Board of Lucas County Commissioners et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al.
as 3:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Board of Lucas County Commissioners, City of Toledo and Environmental Law & Policy Center
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan and Debra Shore
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Space Exploration Tech v. NLRB
as 24-40315
Plaintiff:
Space Exploration Technologies, Corporation
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, a federal administrative agency, Jennifer Abruzzo, in her official capacity as the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Lauren M. McFerran, in her official capacity as the Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board and others
Intervenor:
Tom Moline, Deborah Lawrence, Scott Beck and others
Alabama, State of et al v. Cardona et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 6:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, Jennifer Abruzzo, Lauren McFerran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
