Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc v. Rodney Maile, et al
as 23-15108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY A. MAILE, in an Official Capacity as Administrative Director of the Courts, ELIZABETH M. ZACK, in an Official Capacity as Chief Clerk of the Hawai`i Supreme Court, LORI ANN OKITA, in an Official Capacity as Chief Court Administrator of the First Circuit and others
Scott Sonda v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
as 22-2271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT SONDA and BRIAN CORWIN
Defendant / Appellant:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION VIA THE WEST VIRGINIA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION, RANDALL M. ALBERT, HAROLD WARD, in his official capacity as member of the WV Oil & Gas Conservation Commission and others
Defendant:
PATRICK MORRISEY, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of West Virginia
Fund Texas v. Paxton
as 22-50889
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his Official Capacity of Attorney General
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Exotic Smoke and Vape et al v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Exotic Smoke and Vape, House of Hookah Smoke Shop, iVape a Utah limited liability company doing business as iVapeSLC'S 1 Stop Shop and others
Defendant:
Spencer J. Cox, Nathan Checketts, Angela Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
State of Texas v. Yellen
as 22-10560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Richard K. Delmar, in his official capacity as Acting Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Taxpayers Union Foundation, Buckeye Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance and others
Paul Eknes-Tucker, et al v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-11707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, BRIANNA BOE, JAMES ZOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR CULLMAN COUNTY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAURA BECKER, BILLY BURLEIGH, HELENA KERSCHNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION and ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER
Clarke v. Newsom et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Eleni Kounalakis, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
