Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woodstone Limited Partnership et al v. City of Saint Paul, Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
Woodstone Limited Partnership and Lofts at Farmers Market LLC
Defendant:
City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, City Council of the City of Saint Paul, Angie Wiese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
William Carol Clarke vs. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al.
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Communications Commission, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Extra Hands, Inc. et al v. Department of Mental Health et al
as 1:2019cv00136
Plaintiff:
Kathy Smith, Extra Hands and Extra Hands, Inc.
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health, Angie Alford and Missouri Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Runyon et al
as 3:2017cv00038
Defendant:
Gorham Blaine, Bowen Blair, Angie Brewer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Columbia Riverkeeper, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
Movant:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Cruz v. Zucker
as 16-4311
Plaintiff:
I.H., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, N.V., Legal Guardian of S.V., a minor, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and S.V., a minor child by N.V., Legal Guardian, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angie Cruz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Ares Kpaka, Riya Christie and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Zucker, as Commissioner of the Department of Health
Cruz v. Zucker
as 16-4173
Plaintiff:
I.H., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, N.V., Legal Guardian of S.V., a minor, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and S.V., a minor child by N.V., Legal Guardian, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Angie Cruz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Ares Kpaka, Riya Christie and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Howard Zucker, as Commissioner of the Department of Health
Cruz et al v. Zucker
as 1:2014cv04456
Plaintiff:
Angie Cruz and I.H.
Defendant:
Howard Zucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Republican Party of Louisiana v. Schedler et al
as 3:2011cv00796
Notice Only:
William P. Bryan, III and William E. Crawford, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Republican Party of Louisiana
Defendant:
Angie Rogers and J. Thomas Schedler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trudy Nolles, et al v. The State Committee, et al
as 06-4093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Trudy Nolles, Angie Palmer and David M. Jeffrey
Defendant - Appellee:
The State Committee for the Reorganization of School Districts, Kendall Moseley, Gil Kettelhut and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
