Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
State Bar of Arizona v. Michael T. Taraska
as 2:2020cv11298
Plaintiff:
State Bar of Arizona
Defendant:
Michael T. Taraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Hine, III et al v. State of Maryland, et al.
as 1:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
Cocobuns Tanning Inc. and Daniel Hine, III
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Robert J. Neall, Michael T. Pedone and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Flechas
as 3:2019ad00010
Interested Party:
David C. Bramlette, III, Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander and others
Respondent:
Eduardo A. Flechas
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2012cv00876
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
