Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bishop of Charleston v. Marcia Adams
as 22-1175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Intervenor Defendant:
ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Bishop of Charleston et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv01093
Plaintiff:
Bishop of Charleston a Corporation Sole doing business as The Roman Catholic Dioces of Charleston and South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities Inc
Defendant:
Marcia Adams, Henry McMaster and Brian Gaines
Amicus Curiae:
South Carolina Association of Christian Schools for Excellence, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanza v. State of Florida
as 1:2020cv22531
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Columbia Hospital Corp. Of Kendall, Juan Camilo Duque Ballesteros and others
Plaintiff:
Aleida Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacoby & Meyers, LLP et al v. The Presiding Justiceas of the
as 15-2608
Plaintiff:
Jacoby & Meyers USA, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated entities authorized to practice law in the State of New York
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacoby & Meyers USA II, PLLC and Jacoby & Meyers Law Offices, LLP, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated entities authorized to practice Law in the State of New York
Defendant - Appellee:
The Presiding Justices of The First, Second, Third and Fourth Departments, Appellate Division Of The Supreme Court Of The State Of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Diane Maxwell Kearse, in her official capacity as Chief Counsel for the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts and others
Defendant:
Peter Tom, Angela Mazzarelli, Richard T. Andrias and others
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK et al v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv05647
Plaintiff:
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK , EMILIO MAZZA and DENNIS FLYNN, SR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE and JOHN JAY HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devaney v. Kerbel, et al
as 15-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DEVANEY
Defendant:
PETER F. KILMARTIN, Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD I. KERBEL, Interim Town Manager Town of Narragansett, MOST REVEREND THOMAS J. TOBIN, President St. Thomas More Church Narragansett Pier, Roman Catholic Bishop of Providence, LINDA O'NEILL, Parish Administrator St. Peters by-the-sea Episcopal Church and others
Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de Puerto Rico Inc. et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2014cv01094
Plaintiff:
Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de Puerto Rico Inc. , Ricardo Roman , Fairview Service Station Inc. and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico , Alejandro Garcia-Padilla , Margarita Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2014cv01093
Plaintiff:
Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de Puerto Rico Inc., Ricardo Roman and Fairview Service Station Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Navarro et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2012cv07535
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Navarro , David B Navarro , Scott Campbell and others
Defendant:
Langdon D. Neal , Richard A. Cowen and Marisel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Roberts et al v. Paterson et al
as 1:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
Lillian Roberts, Dennis Ifill, Esther Tucker and others
Defendant:
David A. Paterson, New York Assembly, New York State Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
