Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,956
Hidalgo v. STATE OF TEXAS
as 4:2024cv02098
Appellant: Michael Hidalgo
Defendant: STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
James Peeples v. AR Child Support Enforcement, et al
as 24-1619
Plaintiff: James Peeples
Defendant: State of Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement, Arkansas Secretary of State, DMV and United States Department of State
Smith v. Superior Court of California County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Plaintiff: Andrea Smith
Defendant: Superior Court of California County of Alameda, People of the State of California, Judge Stuart Hing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
National Association for Gun Rights, et al v. Polis
as 24-1209
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER JAMES HIESTAND RICHARDSON, MAX EDWIN SCHLOSSER and others
Defendant: JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado,
Healthy Vision Assoc v. Abbott
as 24-10245
Plaintiff: Healthy Vision Association, National Association of Vision Care Plans, Incorporated, Vision Service Plan Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Greg Abbott, as Governor of the State of Texas, Ken Paxton, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas and Cassie Brown, in her capacity as the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Texas
State of Illinois v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv03979
Plaintiff: State of Illinois
Defendant: Keyona M Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
State of Illinois v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv03965
Plaintiff: People of the State of Illinois
Defendant: Keyona Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
v. Hudson et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: Derek Oneil Hudson
Defendant: District County District Attorey of Kinney, Texas and State District Judge of the 63rd District County of Kinney, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?