Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Woodlands Pride v. Paxton
as 23-20480
Plaintiff / Appellee: Woodlands Pride, Incorporated, Abilene Pride Alliance, Extragrams, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellant: Warren Kenneth Paxton, In an official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, Brett Ligon, in an official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Montgomery County, Texas and others
The Woodlands Pride, Inc. et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv02847
Plaintiff: The Woodlands Pride, Inc., Abilene Pride Alliance, Extragrams, LLC and others
Defendant: Angela Colmenero, The Woodlands Township, Brett Ligon and others
Petitioner: VORTEX Repertory Company, Brock England, Mark Ivy and others
Amicus Curiae: Texas Values
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tennessee Education Association et al v. Reynolds et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00751
Plaintiff: Tennessee Education Association, Kathryn Vaughn, Roland Wilson and others
Defendant: Lizzette Gonzalez Reynolds, Krissi McInturff, Jordan Mollenhour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al
as 23-35337
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND DE BOTTON
Defendant / Appellee: QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor: BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff: Raymond De Botton
Defendant: Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, Warren Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
O'Connor v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv05100
Defendant: J Bowers, Department Head Smith, Anissa Jones and others
Plaintiff: Valentina O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, Division of Child Support Services
as 1:2019cv04803
Defendant: Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, Division of Child Support Services
Plaintiff: Gerald R Warren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kearns v. Cuomo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00902
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, Mark J.F. Schroeder and Letitia A. James
Plaintiff: Michael P. Kearns
Petitioner: Rural and Migrant Ministry, et al and Daniel T. Warren
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Reform Law Institute and Amici States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?