Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Cantrell et al v. Briggs & Veselka Co. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Cantrell , W. Patrick Cantrell , Barbara Nowotny and others
Defendant:
Briggs & Veselka Co. , STEVE AWALT , KEVIN CHESSER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kuntz v. Gannett Satellite Information Network
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
Linda Kuntz
Defendant:
Gannett Satellite Information Network
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v, Diversicare Leasing, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2009cv06008
Plaintiff:
Mitzie Stevens and Charles Kuntz
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp., Diversicare Management Services Company, Advocate, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beach et al v. MK Resource Partners, II, L.P.
as 4:2008cv01950
Plaintiff:
Gary K. Beach, Gary K. Beach, Gary K. Beach and others
Defendant:
MK Resource Partners, II, L.P., The Keeton Group, LLC, ECORP Resource Partners I, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Central Progressive Bank v. Kuntz et al
as 2:2008cv04147
Plaintiff:
Central Progressive Bank and Central Progressive Bank
Defendant:
Joseph R. Kuntz, Joseph R. Kuntz, David M. Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Flowserve Corporation v. Kuntz Manufacturing Company, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00518
Plaintiff:
Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve Corporation and Flowserve Corporation
Defendant:
Kuntz Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ALF Hayden Canyon LP v. Harris et al
as 2:2007cv00335
Plaintiff:
ALF Hayden Canyon LP and ALF Hayden Canyon LP
Defendant:
Michael Harris, Ron Hazard, Stonehill LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.