Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Buckles v. Hatton
as 6:2011cv03011
Plaintiff:
Ray G. Buckles
Defendant:
Daniel M. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hatton v. Assurant Health et al
as 3:2010cv00269
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Hatton
Defendant:
Assurant Health , Assurant, Inc. and Polly Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company v. Hatton et al
as 1:2010cv21570
Plaintiff:
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
David L. Hatton, David L. Hatton, P.A., Orshan, Lithman, Seiden, Ramos, Hatton, Heusmann & Fajardo, LLLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatton Marine and Industrial Repair Inc v. Clover Leaf M/V et al
as 2:2010cv00110
Plaintiff:
Hatton Marine and Industrial Repair Inc and Hatton Marine and Industrial Repair Inc
Defendant:
Clover Leaf M/V and Cloverleaf '85 Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hatton Marine and Industrial Repair, Inc. v. THE TERENA et al
as 2:2009cv01580
Plaintiff:
Hatton Marine and Industrial Repair, Inc.
Defendant:
THE TERENA, Terry Albright and Karen Sanders
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951 Marine Contract Actions
Hatton v. Union National Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2008cv02789
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Hatton
Defendant:
Union National Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
In re MDL-1700 FedEx Ground Package System Inc Employment Practices Litigation No II
as 3:2005md00527
Plaintiff:
Ed Rosa, Steve Hatton, Barry Whittemore and others
Defendant:
Albert Rettinger, Federal Express, All FedEx Ground Defendants and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Special Master:
Hon James Rosenbaum
Not Yet Classified:
Law Offices of George A. Barton and Palmer Freeman, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
