Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 251
Koenigsberg et al v. The Board of Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01044
Plaintiff: Alexandra Koenigsberg, Maxwell Koenigsberg and Olga Stambler
Defendant: The Board of Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Edith and Carl Marks Jewish Community House of Bensonhurst, Inc. et al v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff: Jewish Child Care Association of New York f/k/a Jewish Youth Services of Brooklyn, Jewish Child Care Association (a/k/a JCCA and Pleasantville Cottage School), Jewish Board of Family and Children's Services, Inc. f/k/a Jewish Board of Guardians and others
Defendant: Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company f/k/a American Centennial Insurance Company, American Centennial Insurance Company and Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Type: Contract Insurance
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03367
Plaintiff: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA doing business as UAB Hospital, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER EAST, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Student A v. The Board of Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
as 1:2022cv06567
Plaintiff: Student A
Defendant: The Board of Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 df Diversity-Contract Default
IN RE: COLUMBIA COLLEGE RANKINGS ACTION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05945
Plaintiff: Ravi Campbell
Defendant: The Board of Trustees of Columbia University of New York and The Board of Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
Consolidated Plaintiff: Student A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
The Guarantee Company of North America USA v. San Antonio Water System Board of Trustees
as 5:2022cv00681
Plaintiff: The Guarantee Company of North America USA
Defendant: San Antonio Water System Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carahsoft Technology Corp et al v. Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas
as 4:2022cv00562
Plaintiff: Carahsoft Technology Corp and Webster Bank NA
Defendant: Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Goddard v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust et al
as 5:2022cv06069
Plaintiff: David Goddard
Defendant: BOILERMAKER-BLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION TRUST; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BOILERMAKER-BLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION TRUST, Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust and Board of Trustees of the Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dargazany v. University of Rhode Island Board of Trustees
as 1:2022cv00217
Plaintiff: Aras Dargazany
Defendant: University of Rhode Island Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00504
Plaintiff: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA doing business as UAB HOSPITAL, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER EAST, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?