Cases 31 - 40 of 52
William Tuma v. Eaton Corporation
as 11-57162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. TUMA, DBA Tuma and Associates
Defendant - Appellee:
EATON CORPORATION, FDBA Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
Himmel v. Cutler et al
as 1:2011cv02516
Plaintiff:
Daniel Himmel
Defendant:
Alexander M. Cutler , Richard H. Fearon , Ned C. Lautenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clem v. Cutler et al
as 1:2011cv02515
Plaintiff:
James Clem
Defendant:
Alexander M. Cutler , Richard H. Fearon , Ned C. Lautenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crosby v. Eaton Corporation
as 3:2011cv03084
Plaintiff:
Keith R. Crosby
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. Bricker Transport, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv01421
Defendant:
Bricker Transport, LLC , GT Worldwide Logistics, Inc. d/b/a Raytrans Trucking and Proctect Controls, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Landstar Ranger, Inc. Individually and as Subrogee of Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Dixon v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01990
Plaintiff:
Bill Dixon
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation and Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Youngblood v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Incorporated et al
as 1:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Melissa Youngblood
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Incorporated and Eaton Corporation/27701 Employee Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Eaton Corporation v. Mid-American Products, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01131
Plaintiff:
Eaton Corporation
Defendant:
Mid-American Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eaton Corporation v. Bateman Litwin N.V.
as 1:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Eaton Corporation and Eaton Corporation
Defendant:
Bateman Litwin N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
