Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Richey v. First Mercury Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv00573
Plaintiff:
Justin Richey
Defendant:
First Mercury Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re Invacare Derivative Litigation
as 1:2012cv00259
Defendant:
Dan T. Moore, III, C. Martin Harris, Dale C. LaPorte and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Thompson et al
as 3:2012cv00203
Plaintiff:
W. M. Rogers
Defendant:
G. Kennedy Thompson, Thomas J. Wurtz, John T. Casteen, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Thompson et al
as 4:2012cv00203
Plaintiff:
W. M. Rogers
Defendant:
G. Kennedy Thompson, Thomas J. Wurtz, John T. Casteen, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arace v. Thompson
as 11-3840
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sandra Arace, derivatively on behalf of Wachovia Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
G. Kennedy Thompson, Ruth G. Shaw, Peter C. Browning and others
Objector - Appellant:
R.A. Feuer
ALEGENT HEALTH - IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER et al v SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
ALEGENT HEALTH - IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER , ALEGENT HEALTH - BERGAN MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM , ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
COURVILLE COMPANY INC v. YACHT FOSTER CHILD et al
as 2:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
COURVILLE COMPANY INC
Defendant:
YACHT FOSTER CHILD and WILLIAM F RICHEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Jason Richey v. Motion Industries, Inc.
as 10-5427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON RICHEY, dba On Time Services
Defendant - Appellee:
MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC.
Richey v. Brownstein et al
as 1:2010cv00597
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Richey
Defendant:
Daniel J. Brownstein, EOH Holdings, Pamela Johnson/Lintner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
