Cases 51 - 60 of 129
U.S. Bank National Association v. M&T Bank
as 0:2018cv02628
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M & T Bank Corporation v. State National Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv00787
Plaintiff:
M & T Bank Corporation
Defendant:
State National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. TODD BURT OF RELIANCE FIRST CAPATIL et al
as 2:2018cv03044
Defendant:
TODD BURT, ROB MAHALLATI, M&T BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON MARCELLUS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reyes et al v. M&T Bank
as 1:2018cv04335
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Plaintiff:
Fabiola M. Reyes and Kerby W. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McMahan v. Mortgage Factory, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02020
Plaintiff:
James McMahan
Defendant:
Mortgage Factory, Inc., Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC , Cenlar FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OTTERSTEDT INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. HUDSON CITY BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv10247
Plaintiff:
OTTERSTEDT INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
Defendant:
HUDSON CITY BANCORP, INC. , M&T BANK CORPORATION , ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 (ficitious designations) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M&T BANK v. CENTRAL LAUNDRY, INC.
as 2:2018cv01816
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CENTRAL LAUNDRY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWDLER v. LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING et al
as 2:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
NICOLE MARIE BOWDLER
Defendant:
LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, M&T BANK, KML LAW GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
HERMANCE et al. v. M&T BANK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv10552
Defendant:
M&T BANK CORPORATION and WILMINGTON TRUST CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
KRIS B. HERMANCE and R. CHRISTOPHER HERMANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kwame Taylor v. M&T Bank
as 17-2251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWAME TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
M&T BANK and ROBERT G. WILMERS, in his official capacity of Chief Executive Officer of M&T Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
