Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. AmeriSave Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02952
Defendant:
AmeriSave Mortgage Corporation and Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Kuehner et al v. Amerisave Mortgage Corp.
as 2:2023at00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Kuehner, Sabdeep Bhandal, Gurp Bhandal and others
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Kuehner et al v. Amerisave Mortgage Corp.
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Michael Kuehner, Sabdeep Bhandal, Gurp Bhandal and others
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Heimann v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Wade Heimann
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation, Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bertoli v Amerisave Mortgage Corportation
as 1:2021cv10900
Plaintiff:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation d/b/a Amerisave Wholesale Mortgage Solutions and Mr Paul Bertoli
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation doing business as Amerisave Wholesale Mortgage Solutions
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548 Unfair and Deceptive Trade Acts
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation v. Recovco Mortgage Management, LLC
as 1:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Recovco Mortgage Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suess v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 6:2016cv00325
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Suess and Gary Suess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2014cv22523
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Richard Jones
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
