Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,864
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 2:2024cv08157
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, National Casualty Company of America Limited, DOES 1-50 and others
Plaintiff: Truck Insurance Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
COOK GROUP INCORPORATED v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING MEMBER BEING AXA XL SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003), F/K/A CATLIN SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003)
as 1:2024cv01647
Plaintiff: COOK GROUP INCORPORATED
Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING MEMBER BEING AXA XL SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003), F/K/A CATLIN SYNDICATE LIMITED (2003)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Lewis, Marenstein, Wicke, Sherwn & Lee, LLP v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy Number IME 1021R2 00560 et al
as 2:2024cv07806
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy Number IME 1021R2 00560 and DOES 1 through 50
Plaintiff: Lewis, Marenstein, Wicke, Sherwn & Lee, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Contract Insurance
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, subscribing to Policy No. SUAWS20381-2304 et al v. M360 CRE Income Fund LP et al
as 8:2024cv01964
Plaintiff: Markel International Insurance Company Limited and Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London subscribing to Policy No. SUAWS20381 2304
Defendant: M360 CRE Income Fund LP, M360 Advisors, LLC, Matthew Koelliker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Queens Beauty Supply, LLC v. Independent Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv02167
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Other Insurers Subscribing to Binding Authority B60451056822021 and Independent Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Queens Beauty Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Type: Contract Insurance
Nero et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. RBR40076-02
as 1:2024cv00335
Counter-Defendant: Christopher Paul Nero and Lynn Robbins Nero
Plaintiff: Christopher Paul Nero and Lynn Robbins Nero
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. RBR40076-02
Counter-Claimant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. RBR40076-02
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Palms Pointe Office Park Owners Association, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. OUA30000045-02
as 6:2024cv01444
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. OUA30000045-02
Plaintiff: Palms Pointe Office Park Owners Association, Inc. a.k.a. Palms Pointe Office Park LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al v. BASF Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04325
Defendant: Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, First State Insurance Company, HDI Global SE and others
Plaintiff: Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Jeffrey Scott v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, et al
as 24-12441
Defendant: RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON SUCSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0901LI1837279 and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0180FN2102430
Plaintiff: JEFFREY B. SCOTT
Type: Contract Insurance
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON v. SEATIME, LLC
as 1:2024cv22820
Defendant: SEATIME, LLC
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?