Cases 1 - 10 of 15
GENERAL PARTS DISTRIBUTION LLC v. CONNIE LILES AUTO PARTS INC et al.,
as 4:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
GENERAL PARTS DISTRIBUTION LLC
Defendant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, CONNIE LILES AUTO PARTS, INC., CONNIE LILES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GENERAL PARTS DISTRIBUTION LLC v. GIEZA
as 1:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
GENERAL PARTS DISTRIBUTION LLC
Defendant:
CLAYTON RICHARD GIEZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
General Parts Distribution, LLC v. Enright
as 8:2013cv02500
Plaintiff:
General Parts Distribution, LLC
Defendant:
William Enright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
General Parts Distribution LLC v. Booth
as 6:2013cv00762
Plaintiff:
General Parts Distribution LLC
Defendant:
Jason Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
General Parts Distribution LLC v. Booth
as 8:2013cv01294
Plaintiff:
General Parts Distribution LLC
Defendant:
Jason Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
General Parts Distribution LLC v. Kinder et al
as 2:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
General Parts Distribution LLC
Defendant:
Stephen P Kinder , Justin A Kinder , James W Belongia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
v. General Parts Distribution LLC
as 0:2012cv03113
Defendant:
General Parts Distribution LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GENERAL PARTS DISTRIBUTION LLC v. HARRINGTON
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
GENERAL PARTS DISTRIBUTION LLC
Defendant:
JOHN R HARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
General Parts Distribution LLC v. Perry
as 5:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
General Parts Distribution LLC
Defendant:
Jennison Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Elliott Auto Supply Co. v. General Parts Distribution LLC
as 0:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
Elliott Auto Supply Co.
Defendant:
General Parts Distribution LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
