Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Westfall v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00207
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Westfall
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump and Steven T. Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bennett v. Mnuchin
as 6:2020cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bennett
Defendant:
Steven T. Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Fair v. Mnuchin
as 6:2020cv00244
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Fair
Defendant:
Steven T. Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Texoma Orthopedic and Spine, P.L.L.C. v. Alex M. Azar, II et al
as 4:2019cv00936
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Treasury, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff:
Texoma Ortho & Spine, PLLC and Texoma Orthopedic and Spine, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Cross v. Mnuchin et al
as 2:2019cv02664
Plaintiff:
Lillian Cross
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, II, Seema Verma, Pioneer Credit Recovery and others
Cross v. Mnuchin et al
as 1:2019cv02664
Plaintiff:
Lillian Cross
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, II, Seema Verma, Pioneer Credit Recovery and others
Freeman v. Mnuchin
as 0:2018cv60426
Petitioner:
Ronald Freeman
Respondent:
Steven T. Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Theodore Frank, et al v. Robert F. Booth Trust, et al
as 10-3285
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT F. BOOTH TRUST, derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant Sears Holdings Corporation and RONALD GROSS
Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. CROWLEY, EDWARD S. LAMPERT, STEVEN T. MNUCHIN and others
Gross v. Crowley et al
as 1:2009cv05705
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gross
Defendant:
William C Crowley, Edward S. Lampert, Steven T Mnuchin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Robert F. Booth Trust v. Crowley et al
as 1:2009cv05314
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Booth Trust
Defendant:
William C Crowley, Edward S. Lampert, Steven T Mnuchin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
