Cases 1 - 10 of 633
United States of America for the use and benefit of Curtin Maritime, Corp v. Trade West Construction, Inc et al
as 6:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Curtin Maritime, Corp
Defendant:
Trade West Construction, Inc and Endurance Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tate & Hill, Inc. v. Sanford Federal, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tate & Hill, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanford Federal, Inc. d/b/a Talon Veteran Services, Inc. and Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC v. Sanford Federal, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC
Defendant:
Sanford Federal, Inc. doing business as Talon Veteran Services, Inc. and Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Nails and Staples, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America et al
as 6:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Nails and Staples, Inc. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Nails and Staples, Inc. doing business as Express Interiors
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America and Direct Steel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Paramount Mechanical Corp. v. Coakley & Williams Construction Company et al
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Paramount Mechanical Corporation and Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
Defendant:
Coakley & Williams Construction Company, Corporation Service Company, Western Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
Grassfield Plumbing, Inc. et al v. Within Interior Design, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Grassfield Plumbing, Inc. and The United States of America for the use and benefit of Grassfield Plumbing, Inc.
Defendant:
Within Interior Design, Inc. A Virginia Corporation doing business as Tazewell Contracting and Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
The United States of America v. Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Local Electric, LLC
Defendant:
Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation f/k/a North American Specialty Insurance Company and New Age Development Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Kalkreuth Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Concierge Business Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of: Kalkreuth Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc.
Defendant:
Concierge Business Solutions, Inc. and American Alternative Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF D. HAYES ENTERPRISE, LLC v. Justin J. Reeves, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF D. HAYES ENTERPRISE, LLC
Defendant:
Justin J. Reeves, LLC and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc., a California corporation and United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc.
Defendant:
Stronghold Engineering, Inc., a California corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, A Massachusetts Corporation, Stronghold Engineering, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
