Cases 81 - 90 of 114
Canada Goose Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv08003
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", msnltkx6.ltd, goosejacketoutlet.com and others
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bowers v. Stanton & Redlingshafer, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00812
Defendant:
Janice E Stanton and Stanton & Redlingshafer, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bowers v. Horwitz et al
as 4:2018cv00717
Defendant:
Kram Holdings, LLC. and Jacob B. Horwitz
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BOWERS v. RODMAN MEDIA CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv14256
Defendant:
RODMAN MEDIA CORP. and DOES 1 - 10
Plaintiff:
ERIC BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bowers v. Harvey et al
as 4:2018cv00718
Defendant:
Scott Harvey Real Estate Services, LLC. and Scott Harvey
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bowers v. Buzzfeed, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06997
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Buzzfeed, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Bowers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bowers v. JR Language Translation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11588
Defendant:
JR Language Translation Services, Inc. and Does 1 - 10
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Bowers et al
as 1:2018cv03859
Defendant:
Tan Bowers and Atlanta Food Truck Park, Limited Liability Company
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Bowers v. Digital Brands Inc. d/b/a www.dealcrunch.com et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Digital Brands Inc. d/b/a www.dealcrunch.com and Does 1 through 10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BOWERS v. DIGITAL BRANDS INC et al
as 1:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
ERIC BOWERS
Defendant:
DIGITAL BRANDS INC and DOES 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
