Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sportbrain Holdings LLC v. Mobvoi, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03248
Plaintiff:
Sportbrain Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Mobvoi, Inc. and Brookstone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TainoApp, Inc. v. Brookstone, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01519
Plaintiff:
TainoApp, Inc.
Defendant:
Brookstone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Visual Content IP, LLC v. Brookstone, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Visual Content IP, LLC
Defendant:
Brookstone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Gryphon Mobile Electronics, LLC et al v. Brookstone, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02056
Defendant:
Brookstone, Inc., DOES, H.L. Dalis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gryphon Mobile Electronics, LLC and Spacekey (USA), Inc.
Align Technology, Inc. v. SmileCareClub, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv04864
Plaintiff:
Align Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
SmileCareClub, LLC, Camelot SI, LLC and Brookstone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
STANTON CONCEPTS, L.L.C. v. BROOKSTONE, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00626
Plaintiff:
STANTON CONCEPTS, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Brookstone, Inc. and WORDLOCK, INC.
Counter_claimant:
Brookstone, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
STANTON CONCEPTS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
STANTON CONCEPTS, L.L.C. v. BROOKSTONE, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv03670
Plaintiff:
STANTON CONCEPTS, L.L.C.
Defendant:
BROOKSTONE, INC. and WORDLOCK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
180S, Inc. et al v. Brookstone, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03231
Plaintiff:
180S, Inc. and 180S, LLC
Defendant:
Brookstone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Brookstone, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02463
Defendant:
Brookstone, Inc., DOES, QVC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MGA Entertainment, Inc.
Tropp v. Conair Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv04446
Plaintiff:
David A. Tropp
Defendant:
Conair Corporation, Brookstone, Inc., Briggs & Riley Travelware LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
