Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. E TOP, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00484
Defendant:
Shuping Hong Hurley, E TOP, LLC and Xuming Hong
Plaintiff:
Epson Portland Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Stasher, Inc. v. Zip Top, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv00312
Defendant:
Zip Top, LLC and Finell Co, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stasher, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100
Zip Top, LLC et al v. BlueAvocado Co.
as 1:2018cv00276
Defendant:
BlueAvocado Co.
Plaintiff:
Finell Co., LLC and Zip Top, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC et al v. McCarthy Ice Cream LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02366
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and BR IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
McCarthy Ice Cream LLC, McCarthy Ice Cream Too LLC, Cherry On Top LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Commercial Sewing Inc v. Great Lakes Boat Top LLC
as 3:2015cv01538
Plaintiff:
Commercial Sewing Inc
Defendant:
Great Lakes Boat Top LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
California Scents v. IMEX Marketing Co. Inc et al
as 8:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
California Scents
Defendant:
Does, IMEX Marketing Co. Inc and Three Tops LLC
LMT MERCER GROUP, INC. v. HOME TOPS, LLC
as 3:2010cv06699
Plaintiff:
LMT MERCER GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
HOME TOPS, LLC
Counter_claimant:
HOME TOPS, LLC
Counter_defendant:
LMT MERCER GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
The Annex Club, LLC et al v. Clarke
as 1:2009cv02725
Plaintiff:
The Annex Club, LLC, The Annex Club, LLC, Wrigley Rooftops IV, LLC and others
Defendant:
Byron Clarke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Commercial Sewing Inc v. Marine Accessories Corp et al
as 3:2008cv01588
Plaintiff:
Commercial Sewing Inc
Defendant:
Marine Accessories Corp, Great Lakes Boat Top Co LLC and Great Lakes Boat Top LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
