Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01293
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Hall Henderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hawkins et al
as 1:2026cv12419
Plaintiff:
Tiffany L. Hawkins
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fruge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2026cv11680
Plaintiff:
Laurethia Fruge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
OLIVERI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2026cv13189
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE OLIVERI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Olalde, Jr. v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv50476
Plaintiff:
Dameon S. Olalde, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Harte v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv02905
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Harte
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Freeman v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv14599
Plaintiff:
Julia Freeman
Defendant:
Frank J Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kaufman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv02664
Plaintiff:
Christina Kaufman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lambert v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2026cv07414
Plaintiff:
David J Lambert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Selden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv02661
Plaintiff:
Jessica Selden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
