Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Cheatham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv01636
Plaintiff:
Trevis M. Cheatham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cheatham v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Wendy Cheatham
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cheatham v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2013cv04033
Plaintiff:
Carol Cheatham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Cheatham v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv11428
Plaintiff:
Alex Cheatham
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Cheatham v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Latoyal Lashawn Cheatham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Cheatham v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Cheatham
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cheatham v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2009cv04119
Plaintiff:
Carol Cheatham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Nicole R. Cheatham v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv03917
Plaintiff:
Nicole R. Cheatham
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cheatham v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00402
Plaintiff:
Lillie Mae Cheatham
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cheatham v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2009cv04007
Plaintiff:
Fredrick E. Cheatham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.