Cases 21 - 30 of 1,238
Moon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Dawn Louise Moon
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Tamara Dawn Baker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hyde v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03018
Plaintiff:
April Dawn Hyde
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peery v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tina Dawn Peery
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Cottrille v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Amanda Dawn Cottrille
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Isham v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Heather Dawn Isham
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carrico v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05015
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Carrico
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCoy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04016
Plaintiff:
Dawn A. McCoy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Devenny v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Dawn Devenny
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
