Cases 41 - 50 of 2,518
Casanova v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv14848
Plaintiff:
Martha B Casanova
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Word v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2023cv01620
Plaintiff:
Tab B Word
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jordon v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Troy B. Jordon
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
BENKERT v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04556
Plaintiff:
NANCY A. BENKERT o/b/o KIMBERLY ALAYNE TEGETHOFF and NANCY A. BENKERT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dixon v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Dixon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STEPHENS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv02032
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW B. STEPHENS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MAYER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv22421
Plaintiff:
KENNETH B MAYER
Defendant:
KIKOLO KIJAKAZI and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
B. v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
G. B.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Noah v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01549
Plaintiff:
James B. Noah
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
LORI B. JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
