Cases 61 - 70 of 1,851
(SS) Desylva v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Desylva
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rudolph v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023at00990
Plaintiff:
Ashley Elizabeth Rudolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
(SS) Rudolph v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02765
Plaintiff:
Ashley Elizabeth Rudolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Moran v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv02182
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jane Elizabeth Moran
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Natalie Elizabeth Marie Allen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Hannah Elizabeth Davison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ZOOK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY ELIZABETH ZOOK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Irizarry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06658
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Irizarry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06055
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barrette v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M Barrette
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
