Cases 61 - 70 of 14,171
BURROFF v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
DESTINY L. BURROFF
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Olson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05351
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Olson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Seiber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jamie L Seiber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Daniel Chapel v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 24-11483
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. CHAPEL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER
Madden v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Monica L Madden
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Ott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Carly L Ott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Weston v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv08084
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Weston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
James L. Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
English v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael L. English
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
