Cases 1 - 10 of 2,392
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05379
Plaintiff:
Smitty G Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Joyner Sekavec v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline G. Joyner Sekavec
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOODEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05978
Plaintiff:
ALICE G. WOODEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ewan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Lilah G. Ewan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schillaci v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Schillaci
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Melissa Luiz v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02441
Plaintiff:
Melissa G. Luiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Saenz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Deborah A. G. Saenz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
K.G. v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
K G.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Simms v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
LaChanna G. Simms
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Francom v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Michael G Francom
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
