Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Avant v. Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA
as 8:2022cv02403
Plaintiff:
Michele Avant
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Avants v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01370
Plaintiff:
Teresa L. Avants
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Avant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01339
Plaintiff:
Patricia Avant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Avant v. Berryhill
as 8:2018cv00331
Plaintiff:
Alicia D. Avant
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, US Attorney, NE Joseph Kelly and Attorney General Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Avant v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv06671
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Jermaine Avant
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AVANT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 5:2015cv02998
Plaintiff:
HELENE AVANT
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
AVANT v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01562
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH AVANT
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Avant v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv14277
Plaintiff:
Jason Avant
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Avant v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2011cv00822
Plaintiff:
Lucinda S Avant
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AVANT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2008cv00467
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH AVANT
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
