Cases 1 - 10 of 386
Yarrow v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03968
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Yarrow
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jacobs v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Amber Jacobs
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00349
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
David Jacobs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sopp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06229
Plaintiff:
Jacob Tristan Lee Sopp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fraley v. SSA
as 0:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jacob Fraley
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Porter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jacob Porter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dixon v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Jacob Michael Dixon
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
(SS) Chaffin Wall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jacob Chaffin Wall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
