Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Boggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05342
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Boggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baskerville v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Baskerville
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Howard v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dansby v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Dansby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sawney v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Sawney
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baskerville v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00747
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Baskerville
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(SS) Lansdown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Lansdown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Dennison v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2020cv01986
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Dennison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Davis v. Saul
as 3:2020cv05805
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
