Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Shaver v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Micheal Shaver
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Keri Lyn Shaver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shaver v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Shaver
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shavers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00266
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Shavers
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shavers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00854
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sheila Shavers
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHAVER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00179
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
JESSICA SOPHIA SHAVERS
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv02008
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Shaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Shaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01240
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Keri Lyn Shaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shavers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Willie Shavers
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Shaver v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01113
Plaintiff:
Karen Denise Shaver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
