Cases 21 - 30 of 76
United States of America v. Anderson et al
as 5:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scott E Anderson, Andrea L Anderson, Summa Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Estate of James T. Judd, et al., v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00261
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Estate of James T. Judd and Robert L. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
USA v. Anderson
as 1:2015cv02195
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Stephen S. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 - IRS: Jurisdiction of District Courts
United States of America v. Anderson
as 3:2015cv04345
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Sigurd Anderson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. McGuffin et al
as 8:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Debbie L McGuffin, Anderson County and South Carolina Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANDERSON
as 2:2014cv01424
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SAMUEL L. HUEY
Defendant:
OTTO R. ANDERSON, II
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
John Ramirez, et al v. USA
as 14-56604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. RAMIREZ, AKA Johnny Rhondo
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUANDA K. ANDERSON and PRO BUSINESS COACH, INC.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City Of Galveston v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00253
Respondent:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc., CCI Housing, LLC , JP Morgan Chase and others
Petitioner:
City Of Galveston
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
United States of America v. Anderson
as 2:2014cv00411
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Diane Anderson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Anderson
as 3:2014cv01932
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Sigurd Anderson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
