Cases 91 - 100 of 1,914
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv14140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nelums et al v. Waites et al
as 3:2021cv02162
Plaintiff:
Janet Louise Nelums and Chris Nelums
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Hon. John E. Waites, Jeffrey M. Tzerman Law Firm P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Nelums et al v. Hutchens Law Firm, LLP et al
as 3:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
John C. Nelums, Delmarshi H. Nelums and Delmarshi H Nelums
Defendant:
Hutchens Law Firm, LLP, John B. Kelchner, Lender Processing Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ocwen Financial Corporation,et al., v. John Burke, et al
as 21-12160
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
OCWEN MORTGAGE SERVICING INC., a U. S. Virgin Islands corporation, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation and others
Interested Party:
JOANNA BURKE and JOHN BURKE
Amrik Hendiazad v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 21-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMRIK HENDIAZAD and SEEMIN HENDIAZAD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00370
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21948
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
