Cases 11 - 20 of 116
In Re: Castro-Caicedo
as 22-1968
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO CASTRO-CAICEDO, a/k/a Luis Amaro
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Vergara-Fuentes v. Villarroel-Martinez et al
as 3:2022cv01450
Plaintiff:
Rene A.I. Vergara-Fuentes
Defendant:
Daniel Arto Villarroel-Martinez, Andrea Ines Basagoitia-Gonzalez, Amaro Alejando Cabello-Palacios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
USA v. Amaro-Lopez
as 22-10871
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Adrian Amaro-Lopez, also known as Ramon NLN, also known as Jose Hernandez, also known as Marco Ortiz
USA v. Amaro
as 22-10751
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alfredo Salazar Amaro
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Amaro-Hernandez v. Garland
as 22-60214
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Amaro-Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Amaro v. State of New Mexico, et al
as 21-2039
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JERRY ROARK, Director of Adult Prisons, JOE WILLIAMS, Secretary of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Jeremy Pinson v. Othon, et al
as 21-15580
Petitioner:
JOB LOPEZ, NATHANIEL WEIBEL, ERIC ONTIVEROS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ESTRELLA, Unknown; SHU Officer, BARBARA BLANCKENSEE, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Osvaldo Amaro Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-71016
Petitioner:
OSVALDO AMARO PEREZ, AKA Osvaldo Amaro-Perez
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Amaro et al v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00382
Plaintiff:
Javier Barrera and Rafael Marquez Amaro
Defendant:
Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
