Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Rodriguez-Torres v. Garland
as 22-439
Petitioner:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Jason Martinez)
as 22-370
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Rodriguez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Gloria Rodriguez Gonzalez, AKA Patricia Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Anabel Colon Reyes, AKA Sealed Defendant 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Martinez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Jay
Rodriguez v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.
as 6:2021mc00091
Plaintiff:
Danielle Rodriguez
Defendant:
Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. doing business as AdventHealth Kissimmee
Daniel Rodriguez v. Warden Streeval
as 21-6533
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN STREEVAL
Rodriguez Hernandez v. Rosen
as 20-61241
Respondent:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Roberto Daniel Rodriguez Hernandez
Daniel RodriguezIn re: Daniel Rodriguez
as 20-12326
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Aaron Beitch v. Chris Magnus, et al
as 20-16188
Defendant / Appellee:
COLIN JEFFERSON HYDE, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #49273, CHELSEA LYNN GUTIERREZ, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #37097, CHRIS MAGNUS, Chief of Police Tucson Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON HARVEY BEITCH
Jose Rodriguez Machado v. William Barr
as 20-71641
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL RODRIGUEZ MACHADO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Tanita Produce Company Incorporated et al v. Bella Fresh Phoenix LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00295
Plaintiff:
Tanita Produce Company Incorporated, Monterey Mushrooms Incorporated and CF Fresh LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Rodriguez, Lawrence Ruggiero, Bella Fresh Phoenix LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. ยง 499
In re: Daniel Rodriguez
as 20-10226
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
