Cases 11 - 20 of 595
Lopez et al v. Orange Lantern, Inc.
as 3:2024cv30035
Plaintiff:
Arianny Celeste Lopez, Abigail Ratchford, Andra Cheri Moreland and others
Defendant:
Orange Lantern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
US v. Reyes-Garrastegui
as 24-1213
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
WILLIAM REYES-GARRASTEGUI
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin
as 24-595
Appellant:
EMMA DUO LIU
Petitioner:
HUZHOU HUIRONGSHENG EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, HUZHOU HUIHENGYING EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP and HUZHOU CHUANGTAI RONGYUAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP
Respondent:
HUI QIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
MARTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00254
Petitioner:
EMMA LEE MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80035
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao and others
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80044
Not Yet Classified:
Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao, Emma Baran and others
Kayitesi et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Claudine Kayitesi, Emmanuel Nshimrimana, Emma Neza and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Agramon v. Garland
as 24-216
Petitioner:
GLORIA EMMA AGRAMON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Nieves-Davila
as 24-1004
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID FERNANDO NIEVES-DAVILA, a/k/a Davisito
Interested Party:
CDA EMMA M. GREENWOOD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
