Cases 11 - 20 of 27
USA v. Neftali Oquendo
as 14-14462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NEFTALI ESAU BILLY OQUENDO
Interested Party:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, BANK OF MONTREAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00371
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Maxim Integrated Products Inc
as 2:2013mc00042
Movant:
Maxim Integrated Products Inc
Respondent:
FiServ Inc
Fiserv, Inc. v. Monahan
as 4:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Fiserv, Inc.
Defendant:
Terrence Monahan
Third_party_defendant:
Jack Henry and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Fiserv, Inc. v. Monahan
as 4:2013mc00137
Plaintiff:
Fiserv, Inc.
Defendant:
Terrence Monahan
Third_party_defendant:
Jack Henry and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ori v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 1:2012mc00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Ori
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank and Fiserv, Inc.
Movant:
Michael Gatto
Baird v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 2:2010cv00929
Plaintiff:
Elaine M Baird
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank and Fiserv Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ADVANCED SOFTWARE V FISERV
as 09-1585
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Advanced Software Design Corporation and Calin A. Sandru
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Fiserv, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Patricia Murray, et al v. Financial Visions, Inc., et al
as 08-80182
Petitioner:
PATRICIA MURRAY, a married woman, ROBERT ORTIZ, a married man and MURRAY FINANCIAL, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
Respondent:
FINANCIAL VISIONS, INC., a California corporation, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
