Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Grenier v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2018cv00247
Defendant:
Interior Board of Indian Appeals, Bureau of Indian Affairs and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Gary Grenier
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Grenier v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as FLM/6:18-cv-00407
Plaintiff:
Judith Grenier
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and McKesson Corp.
Roy, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
as 17-1108
Defendant:
DAKOTA MINNESOTA AND EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway and SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway
Plaintiff:
JACQUES GRENIER, VARIETE CLAUDE CHARRON INC, PATRICK RODRIGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUYLAINE ST-LAURENT, as representative of the Estate of Natachat Gaudreau, deceased, DENISE DUBOIS, LUC LAFONTAINE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Grenier v. Credit International Corporation
as 3:2016cv05811
Plaintiff:
Brandie Grenier
Defendant:
Credit International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Laurinaitis et al v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01209
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Laurinaitis , Jimmy Snuka , Paul Ordndorff and others
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc and Vincent K. McMahon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lee v. Cnova N.V. et al
as 1:2016cv01199
Plaintiff:
Drew Lee
Defendant:
Cnova N.V. , Vitor Faga de Almeida, German Pasquale Quirog Vilardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dumon v. Cnova N.V. et al
as 1:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
Charles Dumon
Defendant:
Cnova N.V., Vitor Faga De Almeida, German Quiroga and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stevenson v. Cnova N.V. et al
as 1:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
William J. Stevenson
Defendant:
Cnova N.V., Vitor Faga de Almeida, German Quiroga and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
