Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 325
Adkins v. Maternal & Family Health Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff: Tatiana Adkins
Defendant: Maternal & Family Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Access Independent Health Services, Inc., et al v. Birch Burdick, et al
as 22-3595
Plaintiff / Appellee: MKB Management Corp., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic, Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D. and Access Independent Health Services, Inc., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic
Defendant: Birch Burdick, in his official capacity as State Attorney for Cass County, Larry Johnson, M.D. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners, Robert Tanous, D.O. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners and others
Defendant / Appellant: Drew Howard Wrigley, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, et al.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Leach v. Hoffmann et al
as 8:2022cv01399
Plaintiff: James R. Leach
Defendant: Kurt Hoffmann, Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Franz Siemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff: JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Ronald Panella, M.D. et al
as 8:2022cv00321
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Ronald Panella, Best Care Medical Group, Inc., Jorge Consuegra and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas v. North Mississippi Health Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00260
Plaintiff: Mark Thomas
Defendant: North Mississippi Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Seawood v. McBrayshaw, et al
as 21-3227
Plaintiff / Appellant: DENORVAL LEMONT SEAWOOD
Defendant / Appellee: (FNU) MCBRAYSHAW, Nurse/ARNP, Corizon Health Services, Inc., CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., DANIELLE WAGNER, Grievance Personnel, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Supreme Home Health Services Inc et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv03930
Plaintiff: Supreme Home Health Services, Inc., Emily Winston and Supreme Home Health Services Inc
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, Palmetto GBA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?