Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Robinett v. HEW
as 1:1966cv00940
Plaintiff:
Wheller Robinett
Defendant:
HEW
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Hewes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18887
Plaintiff:
Anita Hewes and Ralph Hewes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Howmedica Osteonics Corp v. Surgical Orthomedics Inc, et al
as 12-3181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP, a new Jersey Corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
SURGICAL ORTHOMEDICS INC, a Texas Corporation, STEVEN HEWES, an individual and ANDREW HEWES
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Surgical Orthomedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Plaintiff:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Defendant:
Surgical Orthomedics, Inc., Steven Hewes and Andrew Hewes
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Surgical Orthomedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc00076
Plaintiff:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Defendant:
Surgical Orthomedics, Inc., Steven Hewes and Andrew Hewes
Bowen v. HEW
as 3:1971cv02862
Plaintiff:
Everette Bowen
Defendant:
HEW
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Kent D. Hewes v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-78252
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Hewes
Blunt, et al v. Lower Merion Sch, et al
as 09-8065
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
AMBER BLUNT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated., CRYSTAL BLUNT, MICHAEL BLUNT, on their behalf and on behalf of all others situated similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent:
LOWER MERION SCH, LOWER MERION SCH BD and PA DEPT ED
Virginia M. Hewes, et al. v. Raymark Industries
as PAE/2:87-CV-00007
Plaintiff:
Virginia M. Hewes
Defendant:
Raymark Industries
AccuGrade, Inc. v. HEW Professional Management Services, LLC
as 5:2008mc00009
Plaintiff:
AccuGrade, Inc.
Defendant:
HEW Professional Management Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
