Cases 11 - 20 of 88
US v. Lopez-Felicie
as 21-1932
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX MANUEL LOPEZ-FELICIE
USA v. Hector Lopez
as 21-50186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR MANUEL LOPEZ
United States v. Lopez-Garcia
as 21-3109
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN MANUEL LOPEZ-GARCIA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Lopez
as 21-40437
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Manuel Lopez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Juan Lopez Zermeno v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 20-73720
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL LOPEZ ZERMENO
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General
Manuel Lopez-Ajualip v. William P. Barr
as 20-2631
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States
Petitioner:
Manuel Lopez-Ajualip, by next friend Santos Lopez-Gabriel
Vasquez v. Barr et al
as 7:2020cv00114
Plaintiff:
Manuel Lopez Vasquez
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, Mike Pompeo and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Juan Lopez-Ojeda v. William Barr
as 20-71093
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL LOPEZ-OJEDA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Gayle et al v. Field Office Director Miami Field Office et al
as 1:2020cv21553
Petitioner:
Rene Jonathan Rosas Cardenas, Roseline Ostine, Mohamed Hasan and others
Respondent:
Field Office Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Attorney General
Special Master:
Matthew C Dates
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rodney Martin, Hatem Chourabi, Esq. Sharon Kegerreis and others
Intervenor:
Reinier Guiba Avila, Luis Enrique Lopez-Pena, Lazaro Jose Gutierrez Suarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
United States of America v. LopezMendez (Morales)
as 20-1045
Defendant:
Gregory Darrain, AKA Sealed Defendant #10, Dennis Smith, AKA Sealed Defendant #12, Gregorio Pizzaro, AKA Sealed Defendant #9 and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Yan Morales, AKA Sealed Defendant #3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
