Cases 11 - 20 of 361
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Brantley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Melody T. Brantley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC and Dollar Tree Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Thompson v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 24-737
Plaintiff:
MELODY THOMPSON
Defendant:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MOON, Officer, as an individual Erroneously Sued As Heather Moon and COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Lockenvitz et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lockenvitz, John H. Lockenvitz, Sarah B. Lockenvitz and others
Counter Defendant:
Anthony Ceder
Defendant:
United States of America and Todd Van Housen
Counter Claimant:
Carlene Van Housen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Brantley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Melody T. Brantley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barksdale v. Buffalo Board of Education
as 23-7937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELODY L. BARKSDALE
Defendant / Appellee:
BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: James Esseks, et al
as 23-13524
Appellant:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL S. CHARLES, LATISHA GOTELL FAULKS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Melody Eagan, et alIn re: Melody Eagan, et al
as 23-13527
Appellant:
In re: MELODY H. EAGAN and JEFFREY P. DOSS
O'Dell v. Kia America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Melody O'Dell
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
